next up previous
Next: The rotator phase Up: Phase diagram for Previous: Phase behavior for

PHASE BEHAVIOR FOR 3 < L/D < 5

In figure 5.4 the equations of state for spherocylinders with =3 to 5 are displayed. The reduced pressure is defined as , where is the molecular volume of the particle ( = ).

We found for =3 a mechanically stable isotropic, smectic and solid phase which is in agreement with the results of Veerman and Frenkel. For =5 we find also a mechanically stable nematic phase as was reported by Frenkel,Lekkerkerker and Stroobants [76]. At values of smaller than 5 the nematic phase region becomes narrower until it disappears when at 3.5 the isotropic-nematic-smectic triple point is reached.

Although the isotropic-nematic transition is a first order transition, the density jump and the hysteresis are too small to be observed in the simulations, at least for small . Only for large values of is the density gap sufficiently large to be observable in our simulations (see section 5.6). We therefore estimated the location of the isotropic-nematic transition for by measuring the orientational correlation function

where is the second Legendre polynomial and the unit vector characterizing the orientation of a particle at the origin while denotes the orientation of a particle at a distance r from the origin. The brackets indicate ensemble averaging.

becomes long-ranged at the isotropic-nematic transition and its limiting value at large r tends to , where S is the nematic order parameter. Of course, in a periodic system, it is not meaningful to study correlations at distances larger than half the box length, . In figure 5.5 we have plotted the density-dependence of the nematic order parameter estimated from the value of . At the isotropic-nematic transition there is a steep increase of S. The transition densities are summarized in table 5.3.

 

Table:  Pressure and reduced density of the isotropic to nematic transition for hard spherocylinders with aspect ratios between 3 and 5. The pressure is expressed in dimensionless units , where is the molecular volume of the spherocylinders.

 

Table:  Free energy and contributions to the free energy of the smectic phase. Columns 5 to 10 in the table refer to terms in the rhs of eqn. 5.15. The maximum values of and were =1000 and =10000. The number of particles in the system was 540. The ideal free energy was in all cases =10.254.

 

Table:  Free energy and contributions to the free energy of the solid phase. Columns 6 to 9 in the table refer to terms in the rhs of eqn. 5.4. The maximum values of and are displayed as well. The number of particles in the system was 540.

 

Table:  Contributions to the free energy difference of a nematic phase at =0.5 and a the smectic phase at =0.6 for =4.5. The different integrals in the table refer to terms in the rhs of eqn. 5.17. The maximum value of was chosen to be 5. The number of particles in the system was 600.

Inspection of the equation of state suggest that the nematic to smectic phase transition is almost continuous at =5, but becomes clearly first order for smaller values of . A first order smectic-to-solid transition is found for 3.1 as can be seen in figure 5.4. In order to locate the coexistence curves we used thermodynamic integration as described in section 5.3.2 to compute the absolute free energy of the smectic and solid phase and the free-energy difference between a smectic and a nematic. The resulting values are displayed in respectively table 5.4,5.5 and 5.6. Combination of these free energies with the equation of state and subsequent application of the double tangent construction leads to the coexisting densities of the nematic to smectic transition, the smectic solid transition as well as the (meta-stable) solid to isotropic-liquid transition at 3.5. The results have been summarized in table 5.7.

 

Table:  Pressure and densities of coexisting isotropic, nematic and solid phases for hard spherocylinders with aspect ratios between 3 and 5. Units as in table 5.3.

The isotropic-smectic-solid triple point is located at =3.1. The smectic phase is thermodynamically stable at higher and is separated from the solid and the isotropic liquid by coexistence regions. The I-SmA-S triple point occurs at a smaller value then the I-N-SmA triple point. This is not surprising as the smectic phase is already found to be mechanically stable at =3 whereas the nematic phase is not.

In their study of the phase diagram of spherocylinders with =3 to =5, McGrother et al. [27] estimated the isotropic-smectic-solid triple point to occur at =3.2, followed by an isotropic-nematic-smectic point at =4. The small disagreement between these numbers and our results may be due to the fact that their estimates are based on equations of state obtained by NPT Monte Carlo simulation of spherocylinders in a cubic box. It is known that the pressure of a smectic can become anisotropic in a cubic box, resulting in an increase of the free energy. Moreover, the free energy calculation method used here is in principle a more reliable method to obtain the phase boundary than examination of the equation of state. Yet, it should be stressed that a small error in the free energy will have a noticeable effect on the estimate of the phase boundaries.

The nematic to smectic phase transition appears to be first order even for 5. This is rather surprising as in previous simulations this nematic-smectic transition appeared to be continuous[26]. However, McGrother et al.[27] also found the nematic-smectic transition at =5 to be first order, albeit with coexistence densities and pressures that are slightly different from ours. This minor difference is probably due to the fact that McGrother et al. did not use free energy calculations to locate the coexistence curves.

The reduced densities of the coexisting smectic and solid phases are 0.66 and 0.68S respectively. These densities depend only weakly on and are effectively constant for larger than 5. As the smectic-solid transition is closely related to the freezing of the quasi-two-dimensional liquid layers, it is interesting to compare the density where this transition takes place with the freezing density of hard disks. The quasi-2D in-layer density for the coexisting smectic and solid phases are =0.789 and =0.83, respectively. This should be compared to the most recent estimates of the solid-liquid coexistence of hard disks [108]: =0.887 and =0.904.

 

Figure:  Equations-of-state of the solid phases for = 0.01, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3. The dotted curve was obtained by compression and the solid curve by expansion. The strong hysteresis is indicative of a first-order phase transition between the orientationally ordered solid and the rotator phase.



next up previous
Next: The rotator phase Up: Phase diagram for Previous: Phase behavior for



Peter Bolhuis
Tue Sep 24 20:44:02 MDT 1996